Quote:
W

W talk about sensory overload. Between Del Fatti and Garrity I'm going to have to sit down and redefine my criteria for an OWB holster.
IWBs for N Frames don't work for me, too much cylinder and leather layers between skin and Levis. Getting old with an expanding waistline couldn't be the source of the problem, could it?
Matt the last one shown for a revolver is black short barreled and looks to have a Sharkskin trim. What is the name of that holster and is it recommended and/ or available for the N Frame 3"?
That particular holster is part of a giveaway centerfold for American Handgunner to go along with Marc Morganti's custom SP101 (I think you'll see it in the next issue). It's an LP with shark trim and, as is every other "pancake" style holster, the most recent evolution of Roy Baker's design. Unless the wearer's waist is especially narrow, I've always thought the LP made a good general purpose concealment holster. It distributes the handgun weight over a broader footprint on the belt and the outboard wings control both the vertical and horizontal rotational movement of the handgun (providing the holster positions the handgun center of mass close to the belt and assuming the belt is a sturdy one). Many people suggest that the wings force the gun to "ride closer to the body" but I think that's an inaccurate description. Since the gun's thickness is fixed and since on most holsters there's only one thickness (two with a belt loop between the handgun and your body). One thickness of leather (or two with the belt loop) is as close as it can ever ride to your body (without surgical body sculpting). I think the reduction in rotational movement is what people perceive as riding closer to the body. And finally, the fore and aft wings provide little "ramps" that allow the covering garment to smoothly sweep up and aver the holster pouch without bunching slightly as it might with a wrap around design. It's a small thing but I think it aids in camouflage because people are less likely to notice the "smoothed out" lump.
Probably more of my opinion than you wanted I bet

!