No question my CQB beats the accuracy guarantee more or less out of the box - didn't rest it till the 501st shot - don't think that mattered, no stutters no complaints. No fudging, no selected ammunition, no on a good day - I can count on it for bragging or show-off groups on demand. At this point if it ever failed to deliver I'd check the Ransom Rest first. Settling shots etc. as appropriate and required. I use a buffer in the pistol in the Rest as well; some say the Rest is hard on a gun and I suspect they're right.
I'd rather have a YoBo - if I could swap the CQB at original price for a credit at YoBo I'd do it in a heartbeat. Now that I've owned a CQB I'd like to change some things. The CQB is well worth what I could get for it right now to me though. If it's ever up for refinishing while I still own it then it will get some other changes at the same time.
Accuracy from a Ransom Rest is not the be all and end all. I can't vouch for Gil Hebard's story that Bill Blankenship once deliberately chose a less accurate pistol for Olympic competition because it had a better trigger - I do believe it.
I'd trust the YoBo I'd order to beat Wilson pretty much across the board - but it would have more options than the 1*.
