Quote:
Tim. I agree with you on this. The "gee whiz" mentality of the new breed seems to be double stack nines. Having been a range safety officer on several of the current instructors courses such as Haley, Costa and Vickers those receiving the training trend to some version of the "plastic nine" regardless on make.
Whether it is wider array of the firearm and ammo, affordability (9mm averages 25% less cost then 45 acp) or simple easier to control the mindset of the student before the course started NOT the teacher was suppressive fire NOT accurate or accurate suppressive fire.
One more thing, it is refreshing watching these 95% of these shooters who are like sponges absorbing everything they can. Ninety Percent were newer shooters. They deserve credit as it is quite an expense to take time off of work, travel, hotel and all the rest involved to attend the training.
I personally have never found a .45 to be particularly hard to control, even defensive loads. My reloads are actually close to Wilson's test loads, and they are extremely light as well. I can see the appeal of a 9 for target shooting though. It's cheaper, factory or reloading, but I always preferred .45. I can't stand plastic guns though!